Yesterday, Movado (MOV) announced that its longtime Chairman and CEO, Gedalio Grinberg, had died on Sunday, which reminded me of this agreement that we spotted in an 8K filed just before the Christmas break when all sorts of stuff was buried.

While it’s fairly common to include survivor benefits, especially for a founder of a company, the timing and the scope of the benefits — the agreement calls for $600K in “retirement income” for the first year and then $500K for the rest of Sonia Grinberg’s life — does seem a bit generous, especially in light of Movado’s recent earnings and the overall malaise in the luxury market. Then again, Grinberg’s son is Chairman and CEO of the company.

There’s also an interesting side-note here about the problem with relying on Internet headlines. When I was researching this post, one of the top headlines that came up in Google Finance said, “Movado under probe”. But when you click on the story, you realize that it’s about some rap singer named Mavado and has nothing to do with the watch company. It’s simply a case of a bad headline that got picked up by Google’s bot. But at a time when most of us are doing lots of skimming, it’s just another reminder to be careful out there.

Last month, when auto industry executives drove to Washington, D.C., they were ridiculed for driving after the earlier misstep of flying on their corporate jets when they could of just hopped on Northwest.

But just imagine if more CEOs decided to set an example by driving eco-friendly vehicles. I was thinking about that — in part because I’m still in the process of making my own long-drive back to New York — when I read this contract in an 8K that Clean Energy (CLNE) filed on Dec. 31 because it spelled out the type of car that the company has to provide to CEO Andrew Littlefair: “a compressed natural gas operated automobile.”

Now granted, given Clean Energy’s business model, it would be pretty ridiculous if the company provided him with, say a Hummer (as some other executives get, given how much we’ve seen reported for car expenses). After all, as we learned with the Big Three’s corporate jet fiasco, what you choose to drive often speaks volumes.

Still, at the start of the New Year, when resolutions aren’t such a distant memory, it seems like a hopeful start, especially if other CEOs start to do this too.

Earlier this week, we asked footnoted.org readers to vote on the worst footnote of 2008. And while it wasn’t a blow-out like last year, when readers overwhelmingly chose Qwest (Q), this year’s contest was a lot closer.

But A. Schulman’s (SHLM) fishing camp disclosure took the top prize for worst footnote of 2008. Here’s the footnote in all its glory:

During fiscal 2008, the Compensation Committee determined that maintaining a lease on a private airplane was no longer a cost-effective method for providing business-related transportation to our Named Executive Officers and Directors. The airplane was used only for business-related travel, and personal use was not permitted. With the termination of the lease on the airplane, it also became increasingly difficult and cost prohibitive to access our Canadian fish camp. Consequently, the fish camp, which was only used for business entertainment purposes, was offered for sale during 2008. The only offer to purchase the fish camp came from Terry L. Haines, our former Chief Executive Officer and President. Ultimately we negotiated with Mr. Haines to sell the fish camp for a purchase price of $55,000 and the transaction closed during fiscal year 2009.

As we footnoted at the time, there were so many things going on in this footnote, that it was hard to know where to begin. Second place went to the now-defunct WaMu offering to pay its outgoing chief legal officer $1,325 an hour under a two-year consulting contract about six months before going under.

Footnoted.org will be back with regular posts on Monday. Also: one final reminder, if you’ve been thinking about subscribing to FootnotedPro, our introductory pricing will be ending next week.

For the second year in a row, footnoted.org is asking its readers to vote on the worst footnote of 2008. After reviewing the posts for the past year, I’ve narrowed it down to five. But feel free to post others in the comments. There’s a link to the survey here for those who access the site via RSS or email. You can also cast your vote via the sidebar of the site. Links to the various posts explaining the candidates are here:

• Wal-Mart’s (WMT) $1.1 million associate
• A.Schulman’s (SHLM) fishing camp
• Playboy’s (PLA) disclosure on the Girls Next Door
• WaMu (old ticker: WM) spending $1325 an hour for a consultant
• Qwest (Q) disclosing it lost $1.8 million on Bay Area real estate

Voting is now open. Posting will be light the rest of this week since even we need a break from reading SEC filings all the time. But all of us here at footnoted wish you and yours a happy 2009!

One final note, if you’ve thought about subscribing to FootnotedPro, now’s a great time to sign up since prices will be going up next week.

A few years ago, friends of mine were going through a rough patch in their marriage because she was spending too much time on a site called Adult Friend Finder (no link included for firewall reasons) — something that the husband only found out about after hiring a private detective. I was fascinated with the story, in part because I thought that bored suburban stay-at-home moms surfing the Internet for hook-ups had the making of a Lifetime TV movie, or at least a good magazine article. But I was never able to get any real numbers on exactly how big of a trend this really was, in part because the company was privately owned.

Well, yesterday those numbers became a lot clearer because FriendFinder, filed this S-1. Quite frankly, we would have expected them to file it today — given that it’s Christmas and the SEC is closed on Friday, so it would have been easier to bury. What the numbers show is that there’s an awful lot of bored suburbanites out there (and people who live in the city and rural areas too). The filing shows that there are 1 million people who pay about $19 a month for access to the adult sites. Revenues were $244 million for the first nine months of the year.

Lots of other bloggers — including many who don’t normally read SEC filings — have been all over this story (see here and here among others) and the S-1 does make for fascinating reading, especially the part that warns about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. But at 469 pages, it’s a lot to get through.

My guess is that bored suburbanites notwithstanding, this will probably never actually go public. After all, they’ve been talking about it since March and it doesn’t seem like a great time for any IPOs, let alone a controversial one with some tough numbers. But I’ve been wrong before.

Clearly, this is in the running for one of the more interesting pre-Christmas filings. Still, judging by the pace of filings today, my guess is there will be more. We’ll be back on Monday with a look at those.